I went and voted on MoveOn today for who I want the PAC $$ to go to. I find it interesting that on the same ballot they say, "who would you ENTHUSIASTICALLY SUPPORT" in the race for Prez. I had to give it up for Dean, Kerry and Edwards. They are the only candidates I can see being enthusiastic about, and I can just barely get excited about Kerry and Edwards. Dean is my man, but who knows if he will get the nomination? I just know if Gephardt or Lieberman get the Democratic nom, I will support them, but I won't be very "enthusiastic" about it. How are they different? They are all the same when you get down to it. The same ol, same ol' Democratic party ain't gonna beat Bush.

On Tom Paine they mentioned a ABCNews poll that shows that Bush's support numbers haven't gone down too much. I am amazed that they are taking this poll so seriously. I learned in school that polls mean diddly-squat where politics are concerned, but our society is obsessed with them anyway.

This day is going by so slowly - the internet was down here all morning. This taught me that I rely way too much on the internet to keep myself occupied at work.

CD of the day: Guster, Keep It Together. I love "Amsterdam". That song is an instant fave of mine. You can hear it on their site. I love the random mention of a Shaq CD. Hee hee!